An early fragment of New Testament has been found. This was hinted at a month ago and
further details have become available.
The Mark fragment is "a very small fragment, not too many verses, but it's definitely from Mark," Wallace said. "... To have a fragment from one of the Gospels that's written during the lifetime of some of the eyewitnesses to the resurrection is just astounding."
To date, the earliest-known fragment of the New Testament is from John's Gospel and dates from around 125 A.D.
The Mark fragment, Wallace said, will affirm what is already written in that portion of Mark's Gospel.
The paleographer who dated it, Wallace said, is "one of the world's leading paleographers." Wallace previously said the paleographer is certain it's from the first century. Still, Wallace told Hewitt, several more paleographers will look at the Mark fragment before the book is published.
The Mark fragment will be published in a book along with six other manuscripts, Wallace said. One of those will be a second-century sermon on Hebrews 11. The significance: It shows Hebrews -- whose author is unknown -- was accepted early by the church as Scripture.
Previously the earliest fragment was Paparus 52, verses from John, dated 125 AD. This
new fragment was
dated by one of the world’s leading paleographers. He said he was ‘certain’ that it was from the first century. If this is true, it would be the oldest fragment of the New Testament known to exist. Up until now, no one has discovered any first-century manuscripts of the New Testament. The oldest manuscript of the New Testament has been P52, a small fragment from John’s Gospel, dated to the first half of the second century. It was discovered in 1934.
Not only this, but the first-century fragment is from Mark’s Gospel. Before the discovery of this fragment, the oldest manuscript that had Mark in it was P45, from the early third century (c. 200–250 CE). This new fragment would predate that by 100 to 150 years.
|
P-52 |
This fragment of Mark is
one of 6 manuscripts from the Bible found in this Egyptian discovery. Also found were fragments of Luke and 4 Pauline epistles.
How can a belief system be considered valid when the oldest document is 100 years removed from the time of the event? It was hearsay for 100 years, then people started writing it down. That seems questionable, doesn't it? Could the same thing happen today and it be considered legitimate?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKauSITtnFA
ReplyDeleteOldest extant document.
ReplyDelete